AI Porn is here, Create and Fap
Try Free 🔞
x
  • We recently launched a new Mirroring Policy with the aim of improving the reliability of forum posts, by allowing users to re-post content which was previously shared only on certain unreliable file hosts.

    You can read all about it here:
    Mirroring Policy
  • Follow our Telegram to be in the loop in case of domain disruption/swap. Follow
  • If you have connectivity issues, you can choose any of our other domains available at simp.city
  • Traffic from India is temporarily redirected to SimpTown due to spam attacks with malicious gofile links, please don't contribute to the spam by creating support threads, etc. Thanks for the understanding!

Simp Chat Sydney Sweeney - Discussion Thread

Watch
Sort by date Sort by reaction score
panos75 said:
Between doing Avengers-like numbers and the second worst opening in history for a widely released film there is a lot of middle ground.
Click to expand...
it was always going to do poorly. the real measure is how many award noms it gets. I don't know how you people aren't understanding this. she was never going to get nominated for anything doing shit like anyone but you so she did this this get clout. the studio wanted to see how far they could push a modest Oscar bait movie and test how big of a star she was by putting it in more theaters than it was designed to be in. it was a gamble that didn't work but the film didn't bankrupt the studio because, again, this is a shitty little Oscar bait movie that cost very little because everyone involved knew it wasn't going to make money.
 
Last edited:
ClearwaterBlue said:
What a great point for a movie with middling reviews that mostly made headlines with how bad its box office was.
Click to expand...
what are you trying to even say? it is a great point because you're talking about box office instead of judging it on it's own terms in respects to prestige. but even then you're ignoring the fact she still is getting nominated for awards which wouln't of happened with another ROM com. its not as successful as people involved wanted it to be but she can now say she was in a movie that showed her acting ability and people say she wasn't terrible which was the whole point
 
thebigdickbastard2 said:
what are you trying to even say? it is a great point because you're talking about box office instead of judging it on it's own terms in respects to prestige. but even then you're ignoring the fact she still is getting nominated for awards which wouln't of happened with another ROM com. its not as successful as people involved wanted it to be but she can now say she was in a movie that showed her acting ability and people say she wasn't terrible which was the whole point
Click to expand...
What I'm trying to say, and which is obvious to anyone not trying to be intentionally dense, is that this movie not only didn't make any money but it's also not getting great reviews, which you claimed was the actual point of this movie. This isn't about "no one expected this to make Marvel money" but "no one expected this to make this little money".

Everyone understands that this is Sydney Sweeney trying to show she has range, expanding her portfolio as it were but the only way she's gonna get any award nods for this is if enough Academy members find it noteworthy that the 'pretty blonde' is playing a boxer and skip over the stronger performances of more established actors this year.

As it stands, 'Christy' is mostly gonna be remembered for being a badly marketed boxing movie whose release was needlessly torpedoed by its star's mealy mouthed PR work.